Also On: 3DS
Publisher: Tate Interactive
Developer: Tate Interactive
Medium: Digital
Players: 1
Online: Leaderboards
ESRB: E10+
Urban Trial Freestyleโs flaws are both many and obvious. Itโs a blatant clone of Trials HD. Itโs hideously ugly. The difficulty spikes are totally random. With only a handful of tracks available, it seems short. In nearly every respect, itโs pretty lacking in customization options. Thereโs no cross-buy or cross-play between the PS3 and Vita versions. Basically, what Iโm trying to say is, if youโre looking for reasons not to play Urban Trial Freestyle, it wonโt be hard to find them.
Hereโs why you should play it, though: itโs really freaking addictive.
Donโt get me wrong, I couldnโt stand the game at first. I was ready to bash it for all the reasons enumerated above, and more. And yetโฆevery time I played it, Iโd find myself going back and doing tracks again, and again, and again. Iโd find that even after I aced one mode on a track, there were still others that I hadnโt yet mastered. Invariably, Iโd look up at some point, and see that Iโd suddenly lost an hour or two. If that doesnโt speak to the game being at least passably enjoyable, I donโt know what does.
Of course, itโs entirely possible that Urban Trial Freestyle isnโt a particularly worthwhile investment, and that its combination of leaderboards and stars simply triggered a Pavlovian gaming response that I was powerless to resist. Or, alternatively, maybe itโs actually a good game?
Okay, maybe โgoodโ is overstating things a little. Any game that has so many obvious things wrong with it canโt be described as good. But Urban Trial Freestyle deserves credit where credit is due: it knows how to keep things deceptively simple so that youโll instantly get how to play, and it offers just enough rewards that youโll be interested and engaged enough to keep playing. In other words, it wonโt win Game of the Year, but it will keep you playing for awhile โ and really, what more can a game do?